Written by Gayvelline C. Calacal, RMT, MSc; Ma. Corazon de Ungria, PhD
STAR SCIENCE, Philippine Star
Rain opened the month of June this year. For those who were affected
in previous years’ typhoons and who are still recovering from the
aftermath, continuous strong rain brings back memories of loss of lives
and properties in affected areas. Moreover, many survivors realize in a
vivid way their total helplessness against an environment we have
forgotten to protect. In 2011 for example, Typhoon Sendong caught the
entire Philippines by surprise. The entire nation was shocked when it
realized the extent of the damage and the large number of people that
remain missing. Not used to typhoons and harsh weather, the cities of
Iligan and Cagayan de Oro had to grapple with problems they had never
encountered before. Both cities had to weigh their priorities and manage
their resources to more effectively aid the communities that were most
affected. In order to assist in the post-disaster effort, the University
of the Philippines established “UP Padayon” and sent a
multidisciplinary team composed of medical doctors, dentists,
geologists, public health personnel, forensic pathologists and forensic
DNA scientists to Iligan City several days after the flood. The forensic
group tasked with specifically helping in the identification of
recovered remains discovered the need for a more efficient system for
disaster victim identification (DVI) when handling a disaster of such a
magnitude.
But why identify the dead? Many people including policy-makers have
posited — should we not allocate resources for the living and bury the
dead, even if unidentified? The identification of the dead is a complex
and potentially expensive task especially when all the necessary
information is not documented before body decomposition sets in. Why
then should we identify the dead when they are dead? There were several
reasons that were provided. These included 1) the need to investigate if
the death was caused by a criminal act or a natural calamity; 2) the
planned re-marriage of the living spouse; 3) financial reasons
particularly in the payment of pensions, insurance and other death
benefits to the deceased’s family; 4) proper burial following the
traditional belief of the family; and 5) the need to provide proper
closure for relatives of a missing person. Simply stated, the
identification of the dead is not for the sake of the dead, but for the
sake of the living.
In recent times, the changing climate appears to bring more damage to
properties and a greater loss of lives. Addressing the cause of climate
change is important to prevent such losses. However, we also need to
manage the effect of severe typhoons and to give importance to helping
communities to move forward as quickly as possible. Part of the
rehabilitation process is an efficient DVI strategy. DVI is a complex
task with three primary means for identification: fingerprint analysis,
dental examination, and DNA typing. Information about the external
appearance of the recovered remains and other secondary but
distinguishing features are useful in the process (http://www.interpol.int/
INTERPOL-expertise/Forensics/DVI). DVI teams work in an
interdisciplinary manner and engage the services of experts in various
fields, as needed. One major step in DVI is the establishment of a
missing person database that serves as the repository of information of
all material about missing persons after a disaster.
Fingerprint analysis is useful when bodies are not severely
decomposed. Moreover, fingerprint and dental records taken ante-mortem
should be available for comparison with the same data obtained from
recovered remains. In contrast, DNA profiling may be used even after the
start of decomposition and in the absence of ante-mortem data. The
selection of the appropriate method for human DNA profiling relies on
the condition of the recovered sample for DNA typing and the
availability of reference samples, e.g. from family members and
relatives, needed for genetic comparison.
Read the Full Article..
***
GC Calacal is a senior scientist at the DNA Analysis Laboratory, Natural Sciences Research Institute, University of the Philippines Diliman
MCA De Ungria is the current head of the DNA Analysis Laboratory and the director of the Program on Forensic and Ethnicity of the Philippine Genome Center. The UP-NSRI DNA Laboratory offers its parentage testing and DNA profiling expertise as part of its commitment to serve the community. The laboratory may be contacted at 632 925-2965 and updnalab@gmail.com.
0 Comments